/Users/andrea/_magisterarbeit/korpus/clean/testkorpus/23/file7.html NN ----------------------------------------- : UT NP Directory NN UT NP Offices NNS A DT Z NP Campus NP Parking NN Maps NNS UT NP Site NN Map NN Calendars VVZ UT NP Direct NP UT NP Search NP UTOPIA NN UT NP Home NP an DT error NN occurred VVD while IN processing VVG this DT directive NN When WRB Dennis NP L NP . SENT Rader NP was VBD arrested VVN as IN the DT B NP . SENT T NN . SENT K NP . SENT bind NN , , torture VV , , kill VV serial JJ killer NN suspect NN and CC eventually RB charged VVN with IN 10 CD killings NNS his PP$ Wichita NP , , Kan NP . SENT community NN reacted VVD with IN shock NN and CC contradiction NN . SENT After IN all DT , , he PP was VBD a DT leader NN in IN his PP$ church NN , , a DT husband NN and CC father NN of IN two CD , , living VVG among IN the DT very JJ neighbors NNS whom WP he PP secretly RB terrorized VVD . SENT It PP left VVD people NNS to TO wonder VV what WP would MD drive VV a DT man NN who WP appeared VVD so RB normal JJ to TO his PP$ neighbors NNS to TO commit VV murder NN . SENT According VVG to TO new JJ research NN , , the DT answers NNS may MD lie VV in IN evolutionary JJ psychology NN . SENT Dr NP . SENT David NP Buss NP , , evolutionary JJ psychologist NN , , studies NNS motives NNS for IN murder NN . SENT Dr NP . SENT David NP Buss NP , , an DT evolutionary JJ psychologist NN at IN The DT University NP of IN Texas NP at IN Austin NP and CC author NN of IN the DT just RB published VVN The DT Murderer NN Next IN Door NP . SENT Why WRB the DT Mind NN is VBZ Designed VVN to TO Kill NP has VHZ conducted VVN an DT unprecedented JJ set NN of IN studies NNS investigating VVG the DT underlying JJ motives NNS and CC circumstances NNS of IN murders NNS , , from IN those DT of IN serial JJ killers NNS to TO the DT perfectly RB friendly JJ next JJ door NN neighbor NN who WP one CD day NN commits VVZ murder NN . SENT He PP examined VVD FBI NP files NNS of IN more JJR than IN 400 CD , , 000 CD murders NNS , , conducted VVD a DT highly RB detailed JJ study NN of IN nearly RB 400 CD murders NNS , , and CC led VVD , , with IN his PP$ collaborator NN Joshua NP Duntley NP , , the DT largest JJS homicidal JJ fantasy NN study NN ever RB conducted VVN . SENT Killing VVG is VBZ fundamentally RB in IN our PP$ nature NN because IN over IN the DT eons NNS of IN human JJ evolution NN murder NN was VBD so RB surprisingly RB beneficial JJ in IN the DT intense JJ game NN of IN reproductive JJ competition NN , , Buss NP said VVD . SENT Our PP$ minds NNS have VHP developed VVN adaptations NNS to TO kill VV , , which WDT is VBZ contrary JJ to TO previous JJ theories NNS that IN murder NN is VBZ something NN outside JJ of IN human JJ nature NN a DT pathology NN imposed VVN from IN the DT distorting VVG influences NNS of IN culture NN , , media NNS images NNS , , poverty NN or CC child NN abuse NN . SENT Though IN we PP may MD like VV to TO think VV that DT murderers NNS are VBP either RB pathological JJ misfits NNS or CC hardened JJ criminals NNS , , he PP added VVD , , the DT vast JJ majority NN of IN murders NNS are VBP committed VVN by IN people NNS who WP , , until IN the DT day NN they PP kill VVP , , seem VVP perfectly RB normal JJ . SENT To TO determine VV what WP would MD drive VV people NNS over IN the DT edge NN and CC cause VV them PP to TO kill VV , , participants NNS in IN one CD of IN the DT studies NNS were VBD presented VVN with IN more JJR than IN a DT hundred CD different JJ scenarios NNS in IN which WDT they PP recorded VVD the DT probability NN they PP would MD kill VV . SENT Nearly RB all DT people NNS express VVP a DT willingness NN to TO kill VV in IN some DT circumstances NNS to TO prevent VV being VBG killed VVN or CC to TO defend VV their PP$ children NNS from IN killers NNS , , Buss NP said VVD . SENT The DT study NN reveals VVZ the DT specific JJ circumstances NNS in IN which WDT normal JJ people NNS said VVD that IN they PP would MD kill VV , , with IN some DT surprising JJ findings NNS . SENT For IN example NN , , men NNS indicate VVP an DT increased JJ willingness NN to TO kill VV as IN their PP$ mating NN prospects NNS become VVP dire JJ . SENT women NNS do VVP not RB . SENT In IN Buss NP s PP sample NN of IN 429 CD , , 729 CD homicide NN FBI NP files NNS , , 13 CD , , 670 CD were VBD cases NNS in IN which WDT a DT husband NN killed VVD his PP$ wife NN . SENT A DT husband NN discovering VVG his PP$ wife NN having VHG an DT extramarital JJ affair NN is VBZ one CD of IN the DT leading JJ causes NNS of IN women NNS being VBG murdered VVN , , particularly RB when WRB the DT woman NN is VBZ dramatically RB younger JJR than IN her PP$ husband NN . SENT This DT leads VVZ to TO a DT disturbing JJ theory NN the DT more RBR good JJ looking VVG , , healthy JJ and CC fertile JJ the DT woman NN , , the DT more RBR motivated JJ the DT man NN will MD be VB to TO kill VV her PP upon IN discovering VVG a DT sexual JJ infidelity NN . SENT Separation NN is VBZ also RB a DT powerful JJ trigger NN for IN murder NN . SENT According VVG to TO a DT study NN of IN homicides NNS in IN Chicago NP , , 50 CD percent NN of IN wife NN killings NNS took VVD place NN within IN the DT first JJ two CD months NNS of IN the DT separation NN , , and CC an DT astonishing JJ 85 CD percent NN of IN these DT women NNS were VBD killed VVN within IN the DT first JJ year NN . SENT In IN contrast NN , , among IN the DT women NNS who WP contemplated VVD killing VVG their PP$ mates NNS , , getting VVG dumped VVD accounted VVN for IN only RB 13 CD percent NN . SENT Among IN women NNS killed VVN by IN a DT partner NN they PP have VHP separated VVN from IN , , 88 CD percent NN had VHD been VBN stalked VVN prior JJ to TO being VBG killed VVN , , Buss NP said VVD . SENT Although IN most JJS stalkers NNS do VVP not RB kill VV their PP$ victims NNS , , most JJS mate NN killing NN men NNS do VVP stalk VV their PP$ victims NNS . SENT Stalking VVG is VBZ one CD danger NN sign NN that IN women NNS should MD not RB ignore VV . SENT Just RB when WRB women NNS feel VVP as RB though IN they PP have VHP successfully RB escaped VVN a DT bad JJ marriage NN is VBZ precisely RB the DT time NN when WRB their PP$ lives NNS are VBP most RBS in IN danger NN , , he PP added VVD . SENT It PP is VBZ likely JJ that IN the DT key JJ danger NN is VBZ not RB the DT length NN of IN time NN per FW se FW but CC , , rather RB , , when WRB the DT man NN realizes VVZ she PP will MD never RB return VV to TO him PP . SENT Based VVN on IN existing VVG research NN , , Buss NP concluded VVD for IN the DT few JJ mate NN killings NNS that WDT occur VVP a DT year NN or CC more JJR after IN estrangement NN , , it PP seems VVZ the DT couple NN actually RB had VHD sexual JJ contact NN during IN the DT year NN even RB though IN the DT woman NN had VHD moved VVN out RP . SENT The DT hope NN that IN she PP might MD return VV , , as RB indicated VVN by IN sex NN , , offers VVZ a DT protective JJ buffer NN , , lowering VVG the DT odds NNS the DT man NN will MD try VV to TO kill VV her PP . SENT But CC then RB when WRB the DT sex NN stops VVZ , , and CC he PP realizes VVZ she PP will MD never RB come VV back RB , , the DT woman NN s PP life NN is VBZ in IN danger NN . SENT Previously RB , , Buss NP led VVD one CD of IN the DT most RBS massive JJ cross NN cultural JJ studies NNS ever RB undertaken VVN , , documenting VVG mating NN desires NNS among IN 10 CD , , 047 CD people NNS in IN 37 CD cultures NNS , , residing VVG on IN six CD continents NNS and CC five CD islands NNS . SENT Taking VVG these DT findings NNS into IN consideration NN , , when WRB and CC why WRB men NNS or CC women NNS commit VVP murder NN can MD be VB explained VVN by IN the DT differences NNS in IN evolutionary JJ pressures NNS and CC the DT differences NNS of IN what WP they PP value VVP in IN a DT mate NN . SENT The DT most RBS desired VVN characteristics NNS in IN a DT romantic JJ partner NN , , valued VVN by IN both DT men NNS and CC women NNS , , included VVD a DT mate NN who WP is VBZ kind NN , , understanding NN , , dependable JJ and CC intelligent JJ . SENT However RB , , in IN comparison NN , , men NNS had VHD a DT much RB stronger JJR desire NN for IN beauty NN , , youth NN and CC fidelity NN . SENT Women NNS had VHD special JJ desires NNS for IN economic JJ success NN and CC high JJ status NN men NNS . SENT Buss NP led VVD the DT largest JJS homicidal JJ fantasy NN study NN ever RB conducted VVN , , using VVG 5 CD , , 000 CD people NNS , , 375 CD who WP were VBD actual JJ murderers NNS . SENT The DT study NN looked VVD into IN why WRB people NNS have VHP homicidal JJ fantasies NNS and CC the DT specific JJ circumstances NNS in IN which WDT they PP contemplate VVP killing VVG . SENT The DT research NN team NN discovered VVD how WRB homicidal JJ fantasies NNS are VBP used VVN to TO build VV and CC work VV through IN scenarios NNS of IN killing NN , , how WRB they PP help VVP channel VV murderous JJ intentions NNS into IN other JJ means NNS of IN seeking VVG redress VV , , how WRB they PP can MD also RB be VB used VVN to TO simulate VV and CC rehearse VV carrying VVG out RP murder NN and CC how WRB particular JJ passions NNS come VVN into IN play NN in IN evaluating VVG whether IN or CC not RB to TO turn VV fantasy NN into IN reality NN . SENT Buss VV s PP homicidal JJ fantasy NN research NN revealed VVD that IN 91 CD percent NN of IN men NNS and CC 84 CD percent NN of IN women NNS have VHP had VHN at IN least JJS one CD vivid JJ fantasy NN often RB intense JJ and CC astonishingly RB detailed JJ of IN committing VVG murder NN . SENT As IN with IN most JJS instances NNS of IN homicidal JJ fantasies NNS , , few JJ thoughts NNS are VBP translated VVN into IN deeds NNS , , Buss NP said VVD . SENT Most JJS people NNS work VVP through IN cost NN benefit NN calculations NNS , , figure NN out IN alternative JJ means NNS of IN solving VVG the DT problem NN and CC decide VV that IN the DT costs NNS of IN killing VVG are VBP too RB high JJ . SENT One CD indication NN of IN how WRB infuriated VVD both DT sexes NNS feel VVP when WRB romantically RB rejected VVD comes VVZ from IN an DT analysis NN of IN whether CC torture VVP was VBD part NN of IN the DT fantasy NN . SENT The DT response NN to TO getting VVG rejected VVN and CC discovering VVG a DT partner NN s PP sexual JJ infidelity NN proved VVN to TO be VB about RB equal JJ for IN women NNS and CC men NNS , , with IN 57 CD percent NN of IN the DT victims NNS of IN each DT experiencing VVG torture NN fantasies NNS . SENT The DT key JJ differences NNS between IN the DT sexes NNS is VBZ not RB so RB much RB in IN having VHG homicidal JJ fantasies NNS about IN the DT mates NNS who WP have VHP left VVN them PP but CC , , rather RB , , in IN the DT likelihood NN of IN acting VVG on IN them PP , , Buss NP said VVD . SENT Among IN the DT men NNS who WP entertained VVD thoughts NNS of IN murdering VVG their PP$ mates NNS , , 54 CD percent NN were VBD triggered VVN by IN the DT woman NN ending VVG the DT relationship NN . SENT Whereas IN men NNS kill VVP mates NNS who WP have VHP dumped VVN them PP , , he PP said VVD , , women NNS kill VVP mates NNS who WP sequester VVP , , abuse NN and CC threaten VV them PP so RB heavily RB that IN they PP see VVP killing VVG as IN the DT only JJ way NN out RP . SENT Many JJ abused JJ and CC battered JJ women NNS choose VVP a DT time NN to TO kill VV when WRB their PP$ partner NN is VBZ more RBR vulnerable JJ , , such JJ as IN when WRB he PP is VBZ drunk JJ or CC asleep RB , , he PP said VVD . SENT Because IN the DT laws NNS typically RB state VVP that IN a DT person NN s PP life NN has VHZ to TO be VB in IN imminent JJ danger NN to TO invoke VV self NN defense NN , , defense NN lawyers NNS often RB have VHP a DT difficult JJ time NN convincing VVG juries NNS that IN a DT battered JJ woman NN who WP waited VVD until IN her PP$ husband NN fell VVD asleep RB was VBD actually RB acting VVG in IN self NN defense NN . SENT Interestingly RB , , women NNS who WP live VVP close VV to TO their PP$ kin NN experienced VVD dramatically RB less JJR violence NN at IN the DT hands NNS of IN husbands NNS than IN women NNS whose WP$ families NNS live VVP hundreds NNS or CC thousands NNS of IN miles NNS away RB . SENT Repeated VVN physical JJ , , sexual JJ and CC psychological JJ abuse NN are VBP by IN far RB the DT most JJS common NN triggers VVZ of IN women NNS s PP homicidal JJ fantasies NNS , , and CC also RB the DT leading JJ predictors NNS of IN when WRB women NNS kill VVP their PP$ mates NNS . SENT A DT major JJ trigger NN of IN homicidal JJ fantasies NNS for IN women NNS , , though RB much RB less RBR frequently RB translated VVN into IN actual JJ murders NNS , , is VBZ having VHG been VBN raped VVN . SENT Although IN many JJ women NNS express VVP strong JJ fear NN about IN being VBG murdered VVN by IN a DT rapist NN , , in IN fact NN only RB one CD in IN 10 CD , , 000 CD rapists NNS kill VVP their PP$ victims NNS . SENT Sexual JJ predators NNS exploit VVP fear NN of IN being VBG killed VVN as IN a DT strategy NN designed VVN to TO successfully RB carry VV out RP a DT rape NN . SENT Most JJS participants NNS feared VVD getting VVG killed VVN by IN strangers NNS more JJR than IN acquaintances NNS , , Buss NP said VVD , , despite IN the DT fact NN that IN most JJS murderers NNS know VVP their PP$ victims NNS , , often RB intimately RB . SENT The DT method NN for IN killing VVG in IN the DT fantasies NNS also RB differed VVD between IN the DT sexes NNS . SENT Because IN men NNS are VBP larger JJR and CC stronger JJR than IN women NNS on IN average NN , , women NNS must MD use VV different JJ means NNS of IN killing VVG , , even RB in IN their PP$ fantasies NNS where WRB one PP would MD presume VV they PP could MD do VV whatever WDT they PP wanted VVD . SENT Women NNS are VBP far RB more RBR likely JJ than IN men NNS to TO use VV poison NN . SENT In IN fact NN , , only RB one CD man NN in IN the DT sample NN of IN more JJR than IN 5 CD , , 000 CD participants NNS mentioned VVD poison NN in IN his PP$ homicidal JJ fantasies NNS . SENT When WRB we PP asked VVD people NNS to TO estimate VV the DT probability NN that IN they PP would MD carry VV out RP their PP$ homicidal JJ fantasies NNS if IN they PP could MD get VV away RB with IN them PP undiscovered JJ , , most JJS men NNS thought VVD that IN the DT likelihood NN would MD quadruple VV , , Buss NP said VVD . SENT The DT most RBS frequently RB cited VVN reason NN for IN not RB carrying VVG through IN on IN the DT homicidal JJ fantasies NNS was VBD the DT fear NN of IN getting VVG caught VVN and CC spending VVG their PP$ life NN behind IN bars NNS . SENT Many JJ of IN us PP owe VVP our PP$ lives NNS to TO the DT fact NN that IN murder NN is VBZ so RB costly JJ to TO commit VV in IN the DT modern JJ world NN . SENT Public JJ humiliation NN tends VVZ to TO lead VV to TO especially RB violent JJ fantasies NNS about IN killing VVG the DT tormentor NN . SENT The DT vividness NN and CC elaborated VVD details NNS of IN such JJ homicidal JJ fantasies NNS highlight VV the DT magnitude NN of IN the DT social JJ cost NN and CC psychological JJ agony NN experienced VVN by IN those DT whose WP$ reputations NNS are VBP damaged VVN . SENT For IN men NNS there EX are VBP even RB higher JJR stakes NNS , , given VVN that IN their PP$ status NN and CC reputation NN are VBP important JJ in IN attracting VVG a DT mate NN . SENT Instances NNS of IN being VBG embarrassed VVN or CC ridiculed VVN in IN public NN may MD lead VV to TO a DT violent JJ reaction NN . SENT Men NNS are VBP far RB more RBR likely JJ than IN women NNS when WRB losing VVG their PP$ jobs NNS , , to TO take VV revenge NN by IN shooting VVG a DT boss NN or CC rival JJ co NP worker NN whom WP they PP blame VVP for IN their PP$ demise NN . SENT Another DT scenario NN is VBZ that IN a DT man NN may MD suffer VV more JJR ridicule NN when WRB his PP$ wife NN cheats NNS and CC his PP$ reputation NN may MD suffer VV catastrophic JJ damage NN . SENT Serial JJ killers NNS account VVP for IN only RB one CD to TO two CD percent NN of IN all DT murders NNS , , and CC according VVG to TO Buss NP s PP theory NN , , may MD murder NN because IN they PP seek VVP vengeance NN for IN status NN denied VVD , , while IN mass NN murderers NNS kill VVP to TO get VV to TO the DT top NN in IN a DT status NN hierarchy NN and CC stay VV there RB . SENT I PP would MD argue VV that IN the DT underlying JJ motivations NNS that WDT drive VVP them PP to TO kill VV are VBP the DT same JJ as IN those DT behind IN the DT everyday JJ killings NNS over IN status NN and CC reputation NN , , Buss NP said VVD . SENT For IN example NN , , Ted NP Bundy NP , , one CD of IN the DT world NN s PP most RBS prolific JJ serial JJ killers NNS with IN a DT death NN toll NN of IN at IN least JJS 36 CD female JJ victims NNS , , began VVD his PP$ spree NN after IN a DT beautiful JJ woman NN of IN higher JJR social JJ standing NN spurned VVD his PP$ offer NN of IN marriage NN . SENT Bundy NP explained VVD his PP$ motivation NN for IN killing VVG as IN stealing VVG the DT most RBS valuable JJ possessions NNS of IN the DT established VVN classes NNS , , their PP$ beautiful JJ and CC talented JJ young JJ women NNS . SENT Serial JJ killers NNS and CC mass NN murderers NNS , , at IN least JJS the DT successful JJ ones NNS , , almost RB invariably RB achieve VV a DT certain JJ sort NN of IN status NN , , Buss NP said VVD . SENT Many JJ , , in IN fact NN , , married VVN and CC had VHD children NNS after IN they PP were VBD caught VVN and CC convicted VVN . SENT The DT children NNS of IN Charles NP Manson NP and CC Ted NP Bundy NP are VBP among IN us PP today NN . SENT Amazingly RB , , even RB today RB convicted VVN murderers NNS remain VVP highly RB appealing VVG to TO some DT women NNS . SENT Scott NP Peterson NP , , recently RB convicted VVN of IN murdering VVG his PP$ wife NN and CC unborn JJ child NN , , has VHZ been VBN bombarded VVN with IN hundreds NNS of IN love NN letters NNS and CC marriage NN proposals NNS . SENT For IN centuries NNS , , power NN and CC status NN has VHZ affected VVN a DT man NN s PP reproductive JJ success NN . SENT Oxford NP geneticist NN Dr NN . SENT Chris NP Tyler NP Smith NP and CC his PP$ colleagues NNS discovered VVD roughly RB half PDT a DT percent NN of IN the DT world NN s PP population NN , , 16 CD million CD people NNS , , are VBP likely RB modern JJ descendants NNS of IN fierce JJ Mongol JJ emperor NN Genghis NP Khan NP . SENT People NNS might MD mistakenly RB assume VV that IN the DT theory NN of IN adaptations NNS for IN murder NN implies VVZ approval NN or CC acceptance NN of IN killing NN , , Buss NP said VVD . SENT It PP doesn NN t NN . SENT I PP would MD suggest VV instead RB that IN those DT who WP create VVP myths NNS of IN a DT peaceful JJ human JJ past NN , , who WP blame VVP killing VVG on IN the DT contemporary JJ ills NNS of IN modern JJ culture NN , , and CC who WP cling VVP to TO single VV variable JJ theories NNS that WDT have VHP long RB outlived VVN their PP$ scientific JJ warrant NN tread VV on IN dangerous JJ moral JJ ground NN . SENT The DT problem NN of IN murder NN cannot NN be VB solved VVN by IN wishing VVG away RP those DT aspects NNS of IN human JJ nature NN that IN we PP desire VVP not RB to TO exist VV . SENT As IN an DT evolutionary JJ psychologist NN , , he PP added VVD , , I PP ve RB become VVP accustomed VVN to TO critics NNS who WP confuse VV what WP is VBZ with IN what WP ought MD to TO be VB . SENT We PP can MD prevent VV murder NN , , in IN principle NN , , through IN a DT deep JJ understanding NN of IN its PP$ underlying JJ psychological JJ circuits NNS and CC designing VVG environments NNS that WDT prevent VVP their PP$ activation NN . SENT Michelle NP Bryant NP Office NP of IN Public NP Affairs NPS College NP of IN Liberal NP Arts NPS Related NP Stories NP . SENT Researchers NNS develop VVP formulas NNS to TO replicate VV optimal JJ vision NN tracking VVG strategies NNS 17 CD March NP 2005 CD Leadership NN status NN affects VVZ cognitive JJ performance NN of IN people NNS with IN higher JJR testosterone NN levels NNS 2 CD February NP 2005 CD Writing VVG to TO Heal NP . SENT Research NN shows NNS writing VVG about IN emotional JJ experiences NNS can MD have VH tangible JJ health NN benefits VVZ 10 CD January NP 2005 CD Related NP Sites NP . SENT Dr NP . SENT David NP Buss NP Evolutionary JJ Psychology NP Lab NP Department NP of IN Psychology NP College NP of IN Liberal NP Arts NPS Human NP Behavior NN and CC Evolution NN Society NP 2005 CD Conference NP Office NP of IN Public NP Affairs NPS P NN . SENT O NN . SENT Box NP Z NP Austin NP , , Texas NP 78713 CD 7509 CD 512 JJ 471 CD 3151 CD Fax NN 512 CD 471 CD 5812 CD Updated VVN 2005 CD May NP 30 CD Comments NNS to TO utopa NP www NP . SENT utexas NNS . SENT edu NP