/Users/andrea/_magisterarbeit/korpus/clean/trainkorpus/20/file11.html NN ----------------------------------------- : Review NP of IN Tenacious JJ Mars NP Effect NN by IN H NP . SENT J NP . SENT Eysenck NP Title NP . SENT The DT Tenacious JJ Mars NP Effect NN Author NN s PP . SENT Suitbert NP Ertel NP and CC Kenneth NP Irving NP , , with IN a DT Foreword NN and CC an DT Appendix NN by IN Jim NP Lippard NP . SENT Pub NN . SENT London NP . SENT the DT Urania NP Trust NP , , 1996 CD . SENT Hardbound JJ . SENT Pps NP appr NP . SENT 180 CD . SENT Price NN 9 CD . SENT 95 CD Sterling NN . SENT ISBN NNS 1 CD 871 CD 989 JJ 15 CD 9 CD This DT book NN I PP would MD suggest VV is VBZ an DT indispensable JJ read NN for IN all DT psychologists NNS , , as RB well RB as RB for IN hard JJ scientists NNS , , philosophers NNS , , sociologists NNS , , and CC anyone NN interested VVN in IN science NN . SENT It PP qualifies VVZ for IN such JJ praise NN on IN three CD grounds NNS . SENT In IN the DT first JJ place NN , , it PP summarizes VVZ the DT available JJ evidence NN on IN the DT so RB called VVN Mars NP Effect NN , , i NP . SENT e SYM . SENT the DT hypothesis NN that IN outstanding JJ sportsmen NNS and CC women NNS are VBP significantly RB more RBR likely JJ than IN other JJ people NNS to TO be VB born VVN when WRB Mars NP is VBZ just RB rising VVG or CC overhead NN . SENT The DT effect NN is VBZ not RB very RB large JJ , , and CC of IN no DT practical JJ importance NN , , but CC it PP is VBZ totally RB unexpected JJ on IN scientific JJ grounds NNS , , and CC at IN present JJ at IN least JJS impossible JJ to TO explain VV rationally RB . SENT As IN George NP Abell NP , , and CC astronomer NN initially RB very RB critical JJ of IN the DT phenomenon NN wrote VVD . SENT The DT Mars NP effect NN , , to TO be VB real JJ , , would MD require VV new JJ physics NNS beyond IN anything NN that IN science NN can NN at IN present JJ understand VVP . SENT As IN the DT book NN makes VVZ clear JJ , , the DT evidence NN for IN the DT Mars NP effect NN is VBZ now RB so RB strong JJ that IN it PP seems VVZ impossible JJ to TO deny VV . SENT hence RB this DT is VBZ a DT phenomenon NN of IN great JJ scientific JJ importance NN . SENT It PP may MD of IN course NN be VB possible JJ in IN due JJ course NN to TO understand VV it PP along IN traditional JJ lines NNS , , but CC this DT possibility NN does VVZ not RB seem VV to TO rest VV on IN very RB strong JJ foundations NNS . SENT What WP then RB is VBZ the DT evidence NN . SENT It PP was VBD originally RB produced VVN by IN Michel NP Gauquelin NP , , a DT French JJ psychologist NN , , and CC his PP$ wife NN Fran NP oise NP , , a DT statistician NN . SENT Comparing VVG large JJ samples NNS of IN sports NNS champions NNS and CC ordinary JJ people NNS , , they PP found VVD strong JJ and CC statistically RB significant JJ evidence NN in IN its PP$ favour NN . SENT Publication NN of IN their PP$ results NNS ran VVD into IN a DT storm NN of IN criticism NN , , much RB of IN it PP ill RB informed VVD and CC patently RB prejudiced VVN . SENT I PP was VBD allowed VVN as RB were VBD many JJ scientists NNS interested VVN in IN the DT phenomenon NN to TO go VV over RP their PP$ results NNS , , and CC could MD find VV nothing NN wrong JJ . SENT none NN of IN the DT critics NNS bothered VVD . SENT Three CD large JJ replication NN studies NNS were VBD set VVN up RP by IN highly RB critical JJ groups NNS in IN Belgium NP , , USA NP and CC France NP , , in IN an DT endeavour NN to TO find VV evidence NN against IN Gauquelin NP . SENT all DT failed VVD , , as IN this DT detailed JJ account NN , , which WDT includes VVZ re NN analyses NNS of IN all PDT the DT published VVN data NNS , , makes VVZ clear JJ . SENT We PP thus RB have VHP four CD independent JJ , , large JJ scale NN studies NNS , , three CD of IN them PP carried VVD out RP by IN self NN confessed VVD sceptics NNS and CC enemies NNS of IN the DT hypothesis NN , , which WDT give VVP very RB positive JJ answers NNS to TO this DT question NN . SENT Does VVZ the DT Mars NP Effect NN exist VVP . SENT It PP is VBZ difficult JJ to TO think VV that IN it PP does VVZ not RB . SENT hence RB the DT scientific JJ interest NN in IN this DT book NN . SENT The DT second JJ point NN of IN interest NN is VBZ in IN the DT detailed JJ presentation NN of IN the DT incredible JJ shenanigans NNS to TO which WDT the DT three CD hostile JJ replication NN groups NNS resorted VVD when WRB to TO their PP$ horror NN results NNS of IN their PP$ studies NNS turned VVD out RB favourable JJ to TO Gauquelin NP . SENT These DT accounts VVZ really RB have VH to TO be VB read VVN , , savoured VVN and CC appreciated VVN by IN anyone NN who WP believes VVZ that IN hard JJ scientists NNS are VBP concerned VVN with IN facts NNS , , truth NN , , evidence NN . SENT Findings NNS are VBP kept VVN secret JJ and CC not RB published VVN when WRB results NNS are VBP not RB as RB clear JJ as RB might MD be VB desired VVN , , for IN reasons NNS as IN discussed VVN in IN this DT book NN . SENT The DT other JJ interest NN is VBZ related VVN to TO the DT reception NN of IN the DT message NN that IN the DT Mars NP effect NN is VBZ a DT reality NN by IN people NNS with IN a DT scientific JJ training NN . SENT Readers NNS are VBP invited VVN to TO try VV it PP out RP . SENT Just RB tell VV your PP$ scientific JJ friends NNS what WP the DT facts NNS are VBP . SENT They PP will MD squirm VV , , put VV up RP all DT sorts NNS of IN irrational JJ objections NNS , , argue VVP that IN the DT facts NNS can MD t NN be VB true JJ and CC finally RB refuse VVP to TO look VV at IN the DT facts NNS . SENT Nothing NN has VHZ changed VVN since IN Aristotelian JJ astronomers NNS refused VVD to TO look VV through IN Galileo NP s PP telescope NN to TO see VV the DT four CD moons NNS of IN Jupiter NP . SENT This DT too RB is VBZ an DT interesting JJ psychological JJ phenomenon NN we PP might MD well RB investigate VV . SENT Let VV me PP add VV that IN Ertel NP , , who WP had VHD access NN to TO all PDT the DT data NNS from IN all PDT these DT investigations NNS , , both CC published VVN and CC unpublished JJ , , is VBZ a DT well RB know VVP psychologist NN and CC statistician NN , , completely RB impartial JJ he PP found VVD many JJ errors NNS in IN Gauquelin NP s PP data NNS , , and CC is VBZ critical JJ of IN several JJ of IN his PP$ findings NNS , , and CC absolutely RB reliable JJ as RB far RB as IN re NN analyses NNS are VBP concerned VVN . SENT He PP is VBZ devoted VVN to TO objectivity NN , , and CC translated VVN Gauquelin NP s PP statement NN that IN the DT more RBR famous JJ the DT sportsman NN , , the DT greater JJR the DT Mars NP effect NN , , into IN an DT objective NN and CC testable JJ hypothesis NN . SENT If IN you PP do VVP not RB believe VV a DT word NN I PP have VHP said VVD , , read VVD the DT book NN . SENT it PP will MD be VB a DT revelation NN . SENT I PP should MD perhaps RB add VV that IN as IN one CD of IN the DT first JJ to TO come VV out RP in IN favour NN of IN Gauquelin NP , , I PP have VHP been VBN accused VVN of IN favouring VVG astrology NN , , of IN having VHG a DT non JJ scientific JJ attitude NN , , of IN believing VVG nonsense NN . SENT Guilt NN by IN association NN . SENT The DT evidence NN for IN the DT Mars NP effect NN is VBZ better JJR than IN for IN most JJS of IN the DT facts NNS you PP will MD encounter VV in IN your PP$ psychology NN textbooks NNS , , and CC incomparably RB stronger JJR than IN that IN for IN psychoanalysis NN . SENT yet RB Freud NP figures NNS in IN all PDT our PP$ textbooks NNS , , Gauquelin NP is VBZ not RB mentioned VVN . SENT This DT may MD tell VV us PP something NN about IN psychology NN as IN a DT science NN . SENT H NP . SENT J NP . SENT Eysenck NP , , Ph NN . SENT D NP , , D NP . SENT Sc NN . SENT , , Professor NP Emiritus NP of IN Psychology NP University NP of IN London NP From IN Personality NN and CC Individual JJ Differences NNS PAID VVD , , 1996 CD . SENT Reprinted VVN with IN permission NN Return NN To TO TME NP Page NP