/Users/andrea/_magisterarbeit/korpus/clean/trainkorpus/19/file_245h.html NN ----------------------------------------- : Spirituality NN . SENT The DT triumph NN of IN the DT individual NN and CC the DT Spiritual JJ Supermarket NN phenomenon NN . SENT How WRB can MD violence NN be VB avoided VVN without IN adding VVG to TO it PP . SENT Interview NN with IN Professor NP Denaux NP KUL NP Louvain NP , , 29 CD May NP 2001 CD CIP NP HRWF NP International NP Secretariat NN 14 CD . SENT 06 CD . SENT 2001 CD Website NN . SENT http NN . SENT www JJ . SENT hrwf NN . SENT net JJ Email NP . SENT info NN hrwf NN . SENT net JJ All DT kinds NNS of IN spiritualities NNS have VHP blossomed VVN into IN life NN in IN the DT public JJ sphere NN , , rather RB like IN a DT supermarket NN of IN beliefs NNS . SENT Newly RB arrived VVN spiritualities NNS have VHP aroused VVN suspicion NN , , in IN churches NNS as RB well RB as IN society NN in IN general NN . SENT Are VBP they PP sects NNS . SENT The DT term NN is VBZ far RB from IN neutral JJ , , and CC is VBZ thrown VVN into IN the DT debate NN to TO stand VV in IN the DT way NN of IN possible JJ violence NN . SENT But CC where WRB does VVZ this DT violence NN originate VV . SENT A DT question NN that IN each DT one NN must MD ask VV themselves PP , , stated VVD Professor NP Adelbert NP Denaux NP from IN the DT Katholieke NP Universiteit NP Leuven NP in IN his PP$ capacity NN as IN a DT theologian NN , , interviewed VVN by IN the DT CIP NP agency NN on IN his PP$ return NN from IN an DT international JJ conference NN held VVN in IN London NP . SENT The DT Spiritual JJ Supermarket NN was VBD the DT theme NN of IN the DT London NP conference NN held VVN from IN 19 CD to TO 21 CD April NP , , where WRB some DT 130 CD experts NNS gathered VVN to TO discuss VV new JJ religious JJ movements NNS . SENT The DT conference NN was VBD organised VVN by IN Inform JJ 1 CD , , an DT information NN network NN on IN new JJ religious JJ movements NNS founded VVN in IN 1988 CD by IN the DT sociologist NN Eileen NP Barker NP , , attached VVN to TO the DT London NP School NP of IN Economics NP . SENT On IN this DT occasion NN , , Inform VV was VBD associated VVN with IN other JJ centres NNS , , one CD of IN which WDT was VBD Cesnur NP , , set VVD up RP in IN 1998 CD in IN Turin NP , , Italy NP 2 CD . SENT Most JJS of IN the DT participants NNS had VHD come VVN in IN their PP$ capacity NN as IN sociologists NNS or CC religious JJ historians NNS . SENT There EX were VBD also RB several JJ theologians NNS present JJ , , one CD of IN whom WP was VBD Professor NP Adelbert NP Denaux NP . SENT Professor NP Denaux NP is VBZ the DT Belgium NP representative NN for IN religious JJ phenomenons NNS . SENT He PP is VBZ the DT president NN of IN the DT Centre NP for IN Information NP and CC Opinion NP on IN harmful JJ sectarian JJ organisations NNS 3 CD , , set VVN up RP in IN Belgium NP following VVG the DT Parliamentary JJ Commission NP enquiry NN into IN sects NNS 1996 CD 1997 CD . SENT On IN a DT religious JJ level NN , , he PP also RB presides VVZ over IN a DT interdiocesan JJ workgroup NN on IN sects NNS and CC new JJ beliefs NNS 4 CD . SENT Professor NP Denaux NP , , who WP was VBD the DT conference NN at IN London NP aimed VVN at IN . SENT A DT . SENT Denaux NP It PP wasn NP t NN especially RB conceived VVD for IN the DT attention NN of IN civil JJ or CC religious JJ decision NN makers NNS . SENT Rather RB , , the DT conference NN had VHD the DT objective NN of IN an DT exchange NN of IN information NN and CC scientific JJ approaches NNS to TO new JJ religious JJ movements NNS . SENT This DT is VBZ in IN fact NN what WP interested JJ me PP . SENT I PP didn NN t NN go VV to TO London NP in IN the DT name NN of IN the DT Information NP and CC Opinion NP Centre NP or CC of IN the DT interdiocesan JJ group NN I PP lead VVP , , but CC as IN an DT academic JJ interested JJ to TO hear VV points NNS of IN view NN from IN other JJ colleagues NNS and CC other JJ disciplines NNS . SENT Theologians NNS also RB have VHP to TO learn VV from IN sociologists NNS . SENT Sociologists NNS are VBP reluctant JJ to TO baptise VV sects NNS as IN new JJ religious JJ movements NNS A NP . SENT Denaux NP Yes NP , , and CC more RBR now RB than IN ever RB . SENT The DT word NN sect NN is VBZ loaded VVN with IN negative JJ prejudice NN which WDT makes VVZ any DT any DT new JJ or CC minority NN religious JJ group NN appear VVP suspicious JJ from IN the DT start NN . SENT This DT is VBZ a DT priori NN unacceptable JJ . SENT it PP opens VVZ the DT door NN to TO intolerance NN and CC therefore RB to TO the DT violence NN that IN we PP are VBP supposed VVN to TO combat VV . SENT This DT is VBZ what WP Eileen NP Barker NP remarkably RB showed VVD in IN her PP$ introductory JJ discourse NN in IN London NP . SENT She PP dealt VVD with IN the DT issue NN not RB only RB of IN religious JJ movements NNS , , but CC also RB as RB regards VVZ those DT who WP observe VVP them PP . SENT No DT observer NN is VBZ neutral JJ . SENT Any DT observer NN is VBZ oriented VVN by IN a DT typical JJ preoccupation NN , , which WDT has VHZ already RB characterised VVN their PP$ position NN in IN relation NN to TO the DT phenomen NN observed VVD . SENT Mrs NN Barker NP defined VVD five CD main JJ types NNS of IN attitudes NNS towards IN new JJ religious JJ movements NNS . SENT Some DT might MD perhaps RB ask VV . SENT what WP danger NN could MD these DT movements NNS represent VVP for IN society NN . SENT This DT is VBZ a DT typical JJ preoccupation NN of IN the DT committees NNS and CC vigilance NN centres NNS , , either CC with IN or CC without IN official JJ mandate NN . SENT She PP added VVD that IN within IN the DT main JJ Churches NNS , , observation NN is VBZ mainly RB guided VVN by IN the DT desire NN to TO defend VV the DT orthodoxy NN , , ie NP to TO oppose VV a DT divergent JJ or CC adverse JJ religious JJ position NN . SENT Scientists NNS are VBP preoccupied VVN with IN objectively RB examining VVG the DT beliefs NNS of IN a DT group NN and CC how WRB it PP relates VVZ to TO society NN , , without IN taking VVG a DT position NN for IN or CC against IN . SENT Other JJ observers NNS site NN themselves PP on RB more RBR legal JJ terrain NN . SENT defenders NNS of IN human JJ rights NNS rise VVP up RP against IN discrimination NN that IN some DT groups NNS find VVP themselves PP victims NNS of IN . SENT Finally RB the DT partisans NNS of IN the DT groups NNS are VBP typically RB concerned VVN to TO show VV the DT positive JJ aspects NNS , , often RB to TO counter VV perceptions NNS that IN they PP feel VVP to TO be VB incorrect JJ . SENT Observers NNS . SENT never RB neutral JJ When WRB a DT sect NN is VBZ denounced VVN for IN abuse NN , , are VBP the DT observers NNS to TO blame VV . SENT A DT . SENT Denaux NP It PP was VBD not RB Eileen NP Barker NP s PP aim VVP to TO place VV the DT responsibility NN for IN some DT tragedies NNS , , such JJ as IN the DT deaths NNS of IN the DT followers NNS of IN the DT Order NN of IN the DT Solar NP Temple NP , , on IN the DT shoulders NNS of IN the DT observers NNS . SENT But CC she PP warned VVD against IN simplisms NNS . SENT She PP explained VVD that IN when WRB the DT violence NN of IN a DT group NN is VBZ denounced VVN , , it PP never RB explodes VVZ in IN a DT vacuum NN , , but CC rather RB in IN a DT social JJ context NN where WRB everyone NN plays VVZ a DT role NN , , the DT observers NNS included VVD . SENT The DT example NN of IN Waco NP in IN Texas NP where WRB 86 CD members NNS of IN a DT group NN of IN Davidians NP including VVG several JJ infants NNS , , perished VVN in IN 1993 CD during IN an DT assault NN launched VVN by IN the DT FBI NP on IN their PP$ farm NN was VBD mentioned VVN . SENT The DT FBI NP had VHD at IN first JJ reported VVN collective JJ suicide NN in IN the DT burning NN farm NN . SENT An DT enquiry NN later RBR showed VVD that IN the DT approach NN of IN the DT FBI NP and CC the DT Bush NP Administration NP at IN the DT time NN had VHD contributed VVN to TO starting VVG the DT fire NN at IN the DT farm NN from IN the DT exterior NN . SENT In IN such PDT a DT case NN , , where WRB does VVZ the DT violence NN come VVN from IN , , asked VVD Mrs NN Barker NP . SENT Is VBZ it PP from IN the DT religious JJ group NN or CC from IN society NN . SENT There EX is VBZ even RB a DT kind NN of IN violence NN from IN the DT state NN that WDT could MD push VV a DT minority NN group NN to TO commit VV collective JJ suicide NN . SENT We PP often RB speak VVP about IN the DT threat NN that IN sects NNS pose VVP . SENT But CC these DT threats NNS do VVP not RB only RB originate VV from IN that DT side NN . SENT There EX are VBP many JJ other JJ sources NNS of IN intolerance NN in IN society NN . SENT The DT issue NN of IN violence NN and CC the DT complicity NN that WDT goes VVZ with IN it PP cannot NN be VB avoided VVN . SENT This DT is VBZ an DT issue NN to TO be VB taken VVN extremely RB seriously RB , , and CC concerns VVZ us PP all DT , , you PP as RB well RB as IN me PP . SENT Are VBP the DT varied JJ positions NNS taken VVN towards IN religious JJ phenomenons NNS reconcilable JJ . SENT A DT . SENT Denaux NP The DT appearance NN of IN new JJ religious JJ movements NNS has VHZ evidently RB aroused VVN a DT tension NN which WDT has VHZ made VVN the DT authorities NNS and CC civic JJ associations NNS edgy JJ along IN with IN the DT followers NNS of IN the DT new JJ group NN . SENT But CC it PP was VBD also RB shown VVN at IN the DT London NP conference NN that IN a DT series NN of IN actors NNS can MD play VV important JJ mediation NN roles NNS . SENT This DT is VBZ the DT case NN with IN various JJ experts NNS as RB well RB as IN religious JJ leaders NNS , , provided VVN that IN they PP are VBP open JJ to TO dialogue NN . SENT The DT role NN of IN the DT media NNS is VBZ also RB not RB a DT neutral JJ one NN . SENT it PP can MD make VV approaches NNS more RBR favourable JJ or CC , , on IN the DT other JJ hand NN , , toughen VV the DT opposition NN . SENT The DT problem NN often RB lies VVZ in IN a DT lack NN of IN direct JJ communication NN . SENT the DT other JJ side NN is VBZ simply RB talked VVN about RB behind IN their PP$ back RB instead RB of IN a DT meeting NN being VBG set VVN up RP Sometimes RB , , direct JJ communication NN with IN some DT poses VVZ a DT problem NN in IN itself PP . SENT You PP spoke VVD about IN Waco NP . SENT Are VBP there RB significant JJ differences NNS between IN the DT American JJ and CC European JJ approach NN . SENT A DT . SENT Denaux NP The NP Waco NP tragedy NN should MD not RB be VB labelled VVN as IN typically RB American JJ . SENT On IN the DT contrary NN , , most JJS of IN the DT States NPS of IN America NP are VBP markedly RB more RBR open JJ than IN European JJ countries NNS to TO religious JJ movements NNS , , whatever WDT they PP may MD be VB . SENT This DT can MD be VB explained VVN firstly RB by IN looking VVG at IN the DT history NN of IN the DT United NP States NPS where WRB many JJ of IN the DT leading JJ figures NNS were VBD religious JJ dissidents NNS . SENT What WP is VBZ more JJR , , this DT country NN has VHZ developed VVN a DT very RB liberal JJ tradition NN towards IN deviances NNS In IN Western NP Europe NP , , France NP has VHZ taken VVN a DT rather RB more RBR specific JJ position NN . SENT Last JJ May NP 3 CD rd NN , , the DT Senate NP adopted VVD at IN the DT second JJ reading NN a DT bill NN intending VVG to TO reinforce VV the DT prevention NN and CC repression NN of IN sectarian JJ movements NNS infringing VVG human JJ rights NNS and CC fundamental JJ freedoms NNS . SENT In IN a DT parallel JJ manner NN , , the DT senators NNS had VHD beforehand RB adopted VVN a DT new JJ law NN creating VVG the DT offence NN of IN mental JJ manipulation NN . SENT A DT society NN must MD protect VV its PP$ members NNS against IN abuse NN . SENT But CC the DT problem NN , , evoked VVN by IN several JJ legal JJ experts NNS , , is VBZ that IN the DT law NN should MD be VB the DT same JJ for IN everyone NN and CC authorities NNS should MD not RB use VV the DT law NN to TO exclude VV certain JJ groups NNS from IN their PP$ freedom NN of IN expression NN , , association NN or CC worship NN . SENT Currently RB , , it PP is VBZ the DT notion NN of IN mental JJ manipulation NN that WDT remains VVZ delicate JJ to TO handle VV , , according VVG to TO the DT legal JJ experts NNS . SENT And CC on IN the DT 3 CD rd JJS May NP , , during IN the DT voting NN of IN the DT final JJ amendments NNS of IN the DT bill NN proposed VVN by IN Nicolas NP About IN et NP Catherine NP Picard NP , , one CD senator NN explained VVD that IN he PP could MD not RB vote VV in IN a DT text NN that WDT aimed VVD to TO combat VV the DT abuses NNS from IN an DT organisation NN that IN he PP would MD never RB be VB able JJ to TO define VV . SENT the DT sectarian JJ movement NN . SENT The DT position NN France NP has VHZ taken VVN , , that IN some DT in IN Belgium NP and CC Germany NP would MD like VV to TO see VV followed VVN , , is VBZ a DT typical JJ position NN of IN a DT laicist NN State NN that WDT tends VVZ to TO take VV over RP from IN the DT Catholic NP Church NP in IN pronouncing VVG what WP is VBZ good JJ and CC what WP is VBZ not RB good JJ for IN its PP$ followers NNS . SENT Taken VVN to TO the DT farthest JJ degree NN , , this DT logic NN leads VVZ to TO the DT restoration NN of IN a DT sort NN of IN Holy NP Office NP . SENT a DT censorship NN organ NN that WDT directs VVZ which WDT are VBP the DT good JJ or CC bad JJ religious JJ organisations NNS The DT Belgian JJ parliamentary JJ commission NN on IN sects NNS was VBD not RB far RB from IN this DT with IN its PP$ list NN of IN harmful JJ sectarian JJ organisations NNS But CC Parliament NP approved VVD the DT Commission NP s PP report VVP , , without IN the DT list NN . SENT As RB for IN Eastern NP Europe NP , , the DT situation NN of IN minority NN religious JJ organisations NNS remains VVZ difficult JJ . SENT For IN example NN , , in IN Russia NP , , where WRB the DT State NP and CC the DT Orthodox NP Church NP are VBP giving VVG each DT other JJ a DT helping VVG hand NN in IN refusing VVG freedom NN of IN expression NN and CC worship NN to TO minority NN religious JJ associations NNS . SENT Also RB in IN Poland NP who WP are VBP taking VVG their PP$ lead NN from IN the DT French JJ example NN to TO as IN it PP were VBD hunt NN down IN new JJ religious JJ movements NNS . SENT Pluralism NN and CC individualism NN The DT London NP conference NN explicitly RB dealt VVN with IN religious JJ pluralism NN in IN the DT era NN of IN globalisation NN 5 CD . SENT Is VBZ this DT a DT battle NN for IN pluralism NN . SENT A DT . SENT Denaux NP The DT title NN of IN the DT meeting NN effectively RB related VVN to TO religious JJ pluralism NN , , but CC it PP in IN fact NN referred VVD to TO an DT area NN of IN affirmation NN and CC observation NN which WDT is VBZ growing VVG more RBR and CC more RBR visible JJ in IN this DT plurality NN . SENT the DT Internet NN . SENT Within IN a DT decade NN , , sites NNS of IN religious JJ groups NNS themselves PP have VHP multiplied VVN , , as RB have VHP the DT sites NNS of IN their PP$ critics NNS , , nuanced JJ to TO greater JJR or CC lesser JJR degrees NNS towards IN them PP . SENT The DT Cesnur NP site NN is VBZ characteristic JJ . SENT launched VVN in IN Turin NP on IN the DT initiative NN of IN a DT man NN who WP claims VVZ to TO go VV back RB to TO the DT historical JJ and CC sociological JJ approach NN , , Massimo NP Introvigne NP , , it PP takes VVZ care NN to TO proclaim VV its PP$ independence NN as RB regards VVZ any DT religious JJ organisation NN . SENT This DT independence NN , , of IN course NN , , must MD be VB proved VVN in IN practice NN . SENT Cesnur NP s PP Turin NP centre NN is VBZ at IN the DT heart NN of IN a DT worldwide JJ network NN of IN specialists NNS and CC prides VVZ itself PP on IN being VBG able JJ to TO provide VV abundant JJ and CC quality JJ documentation NN to TO all DT , , the DT first JJ library NN of IN its PP$ kind NN in IN Europe NP and CC the DT second NN in IN the DT world NN , , according VVG to TO them PP . SENT Whatever WDT arises VVZ from IN this DT however RB , , independence NN must MD also RB be VB on IN an DT intellectual JJ level NN . SENT All PDT this DT is VBZ interesting JJ , , but CC it PP also RB reveals VVZ popular JJ culture NN . SENT the DT Internet NN , , the DT reign NN of IN the DT consumer NN society NN . SENT Each DT individual NN can MD choose VV the DT contents NNS of IN his PP$ own JJ basket NN , , select JJ sites NNS on IN the DT basis NN of IN how WRB attractive JJ they PP are VBP and CC their PP$ own JJ centres NNS of IN interest NN . SENT And CC of IN course NN , , everything NN is VBZ found VVN next JJ to TO everything NN else RB . SENT This DT is VBZ the DT origin NN of IN the DT impression NN , , from IN a DT religious JJ angle NN , , of IN a DT vast JJ supermarket NN of IN spiritualities NNS . SENT I PP found VVD this DT right NN at IN the DT heart NN of IN the DT London NP conference NN , , where WRB members NNS of IN the DT new JJ religious JJ movements NNS were VBD just RB as RB welcome JJ as IN the DT experts NNS . SENT Additionally RB , , opportunity NN was VBD given VVN to TO some DT of IN them PP to TO express VV themselves PP , , even RB ex JJ members NNS who WP have VHP cut VVN ties NNS with IN their PP$ organisations NNS . SENT These DT testimonies NNS revealed VVD that IN movements NNS often RB catalogued VVN as IN sectarian JJ have VHP ex JJ members NNS who WP don VV t NN regret NN in IN the DT slightest JJS having VHG been VBN a DT member NN . SENT Some DT of IN them PP said VVD that IN their PP$ experience NN had VHD left VVN a DT positive JJ stamp NN on IN their PP$ personal JJ journey NN through IN life NN . SENT In IN contrast NN , , other JJ ex JJ members NNS of IN a DT well RB established VVN Church NP , , come VVN now RB to TO express VV their PP$ relief NN to TO have VH left VVN somewhere RB which WDT still RB remains VVZ completely RB stifling VVG for IN them PP . SENT Would MD you PP go VV to TO that RB extend VV to TO plead VV the DT cause NN of IN the DT new JJ movements NNS . SENT A DT . SENT Denaux NP Don NP t NN misunderstand VV me PP . SENT I PP am VBP not RB pleading VVG the DT cause NN of IN new JJ movements NNS against IN the DT Churches NNS and CC institutions NNS , , but CC I PP will MD plead VV the DT cause NN for IN respect NN , , tolerance NN , , openness NN and CC dialogue NN , , on IN both DT sides NNS . SENT Did VVD the DT experts NNS gathered VVN in IN London NP see VVP the DT future NN of IN religions NNS in IN the DT sense NN of IN a DT greater JJR explosion NN of IN age NN old JJ religious JJ traditions NNS . SENT A DT . SENT Denaux NNS Can MD the DT current JJ pluralism NN be VB explained VVN by IN a DT more RBR advanced JJ secularisation NN . SENT This DT was VBD the DT question NN raised VVN at IN the DT London NP conference NN by IN three CD sociologists NNS from IN the DT Erasmus NP University NP in IN Rotterdam NP , , Dick NP Houtman NP , , Peter NP Mascini NP and CC Marieke NP Gels VVZ . SENT They PP asked VVD how WRB it PP was VBD that IN for IN forty NN years NNS in IN the DT Netherlands NP the DT Churches NPS have VHP been VBN emptying VVG whereas IN the DT New NP Age NP is VBZ progressing VVG . SENT Could MD this RB be VB due JJ , , as IN some DT have VHP believed VVN , , to TO a DT greater JJR progress NN in IN the DT field NN of IN reason NN and CC rationality NN . SENT Not RB really RB , , as IN young JJ people NNS hold VVP to TO New NP Age NP ideas NNS as IN one PP would MD adhere VV to TO a DT religious JJ faith NN . SENT Additionally RB , , there EX are VBP young JJ people NNS and CC older JJR people NNS who WP put VVD their PP$ faith NN in IN science NN or CC technology NN . SENT The DT sociologists NNS also RB noted VVD that IN amongst IN the DT non JJ believing VVG youths NNS , , rationalism NN is VBZ barely RB stronger JJR than IN amongst IN the DT believing VVG ones NNS . SENT They PP above RB all RB stated VVN that IN the DT Dutch JJ youths NNS are VBP markedly RB less RBR rationalistic JJ than IN their PP$ elders NNS . SENT Therefore RB the DT decline NN of IN membership NN of IN the DT traditional JJ Churches NNS and CC the DT Christian JJ faith NN cannot NN be VB explained VVN by IN a DT progress NN of IN reasoning NN abilities NNS . SENT So RB how WRB to TO explain VV why WRB young JJ people NNS are VBP deserting VVG the DT secular JJ religious JJ tradition NN of IN Christianity NN for IN the DT gnostic JJ conceptions NNS of IN the DT New NP Age NP . SENT Precisely RB because IN New NP Age NP is VBZ easily RB able JJ to TO accommodate VV ambient JJ individualism NN . SENT Everyone NN is VBZ free JJ to TO make VV their PP$ own JJ choice NN of IN religion NN and CC ethic NN , , just RB as IN one PP does VVZ one PP s PP shopping VVG at IN the DT supermarket NN . SENT The DT theologian NN s PP role NN Of IN course NN a DT theologian NN would MD not RB remain VV indifferent JJ faced VVN with IN such PDT an DT evolution NN . SENT A DT . SENT Denaux NNS Besides IN a DT closer JJR attention NN to TO the DT issue NN of IN violence NN , , I PP returned VVD from IN London NP as IN a DT theologian NN with IN reinforced VVN preoccupations NNS . SENT First RB of IN all DT , , it PP seems VVZ to TO be VB essential JJ to TO take VV what WP the DT sociologists NNS are VBP discovering VVG , , describing VVG and CC analysing VVG seriously RB . SENT This DT is VBZ certainly RB not RB the DT only JJ point NN of IN view NN to TO be VB highlighted VVN . SENT But CC it PP should MD be VB heard VVN , , in IN particular JJ within IN the DT Churches NPS , , who WP have VHP a DT lot NN to TO learn VV in IN this DT field NN . SENT The DT role NN of IN a DT Christian JJ theologian NN is VBZ not RB only JJ to TO record VV the DT social JJ facts NNS and CC suggest VVP an DT explanation NN afterwards RB . SENT It PP is VBZ to TO suggest VV channels NNS of IN discernment NN to TO help VV Christians NNS situate VV themselves PP in IN their PP$ faith NN , , hope NN and CC charity NN . SENT This DT is VBZ what WP the DT great JJ Christian JJ thinkers NNS have VHP done VVN since IN the DT origins NNS of IN the DT Church NP , , they PP have VHP endeavoured VVN to TO take VV account NN of IN their PP$ faith NN , , to TO show VV its PP$ coherence NN and CC to TO defend VV it PP in IN situations NNS where WRB it PP risks VVZ being VBG disputed VVN , , or CC even RB directly RB decried VVD by IN adversaries NNS . SENT It PP is VBZ all PDT the DT more RBR necessary JJ to TO provide VV the DT same JJ service NN to TO followers NNS today NN as IN the DT evolution NN of IN society NN places VVZ them PP in IN the DT middle NN of IN a DT supermarket NN where WRB they PP immediately RB have VHP the DT false JJ impression NN that IN everything NN is VBZ worth IN the DT same JJ . SENT The DT theologian NN needs VVZ to TO find VV a DT coherent JJ response NN to TO the DT question NN of IN what WP has VHZ become VVN the DT essence NN of IN the DT Christian JJ faith NN . SENT Take VV the DT example NN of IN Jehovah NP s PP Witnesses NNS , , the DT most RBS widely RB spread VVN minority NN religious JJ movement NN in IN Belgium NP . SENT The DT Witnesses NNS readily RB present VV themselves PP as IN Christians NNS . SENT Not RB only RB do VV they PP give VV God NP the DT name NN Jehovah NP on IN a DT very RB questionable JJ basis NN , , but CC their PP$ conception NN of IN God NP has VHZ nothing NN in IN common JJ with IN the DT Christian NP Creed NP . SENT The DT Witnesses NNS do VVP not RB believe VV in IN a DT God NP the DT Father NP , , Son NP and CC Holy NP Spirit NP , , as IN the DT great JJ Christian JJ Churches NNS proclaim VVP . SENT Therefore RB it PP is VBZ wrong JJ that IN some DT Witnesses NNS present VVP themselves PP as IN Christians NNS during IN their PP$ door NN stepping VVG , , whilst IN their PP$ movement NN has VHZ never RB been VBN recognised VVN by IN the DT Ecumenical JJ Council NP of IN Churches NPS . SENT The DT Witnesses NNS have VHP been VBN presented VVN as IN one CD of IN the DT multiple JJ sub NN branches NNS of IN Christianity NN , , but CC here RB again RB , , a DT distinction NN is VBZ necessary JJ . SENT a DT distant JJ cousinship NN is VBZ not RB a DT filiation NN . SENT Your PP$ preoccupation NN as IN a DT theologian NN with IN regards VVZ to TO new JJ religious JJ movements NNS is VBZ therefore RB more JJR as IN an DT apologist NN . SENT to TO defend VV Christianity NN and CC show VV it PP coherence NN in IN a DT positive JJ manner NN . SENT A DT . SENT Denaux NP That DT is VBZ only RB one CD aspect NN of IN a DT theologian NN s PP mission NN . SENT The DT other JJ is VBZ to TO use VV the DT internal JJ coherence NN of IN the DT Christian JJ faith NN to TO help VV the DT Christian NP to TO widen VV out IN themselves PP in IN that DT faith NN . SENT And CC it PP is VBZ here RB that IN , , as IN a DT theologian NN , , I PP distinguish VV myself PP the DT most JJS from IN a DT sociologist NN s PP point VVP of IN view NN . SENT Often RB a DT sociologist NN will MD not RB be VB interested VVN in IN the DT content NN of IN what WP he PP calls VVZ the DT beliefs NNS . SENT Not RB because IN he PP fails VVZ to TO know VV or CC distrusts VVZ them PP , , but CC because IN he PP cannot NN be VB too RB proud JJ of IN them PP for IN his PP$ observation NN . SENT a DT number NN of IN Belgians NNS , , for IN example NN , , call NN themselves PP Catholics NPS and CC even RB practising VVG Catholics NPS , , whilst IN believing VVG that IN God NP is VBZ not RB really RB a DT person NN , , but CC rather RB a DT force NN of IN nature NN . SENT Amongst IN this DT fraction NN of IN practising VVG Catholics NPS , , it PP does VVZ happen VV that IN some DT hesitate VVP over IN the DT importance NN that WDT should MD be VB given VVN to TO Jesus NP or CC to TO evangelical JJ inspiration NN in IN their PP$ everyday JJ life NN . SENT I PP respect VV these DT persons NNS , , but CC I PP cannot NN share NN their PP$ position NN . SENT Sociologists NNS often RB state VVP with IN irony NN that IN the DT Christians NNS who WP claim VVP to TO share VV the DT same JJ essential JJ convictions NNS differ VVP in IN a DT series NN of IN realities NNS in IN their PP$ moral JJ or CC political JJ valuations NNS . SENT Of IN course NN , , freedom NN of IN conscience NN has VHZ its PP$ own JJ rights NNS . SENT But CC the DT theologian NN in IN me PP will MD never RB be VB satisfied VVN with IN the DT difference NN that IN I PP remark VV between IN beliefs NNS and CC behaviour NN . SENT To TO claim VV to TO love NN God NP whom WP one CD cannot NN see VVP and CC to TO fail VV to TO love VV one PP s PP brother NN whom WP one PP can MD see VV , , is VBZ a DT serious JJ incoherence NN towards IN which WDT Christ NP s PP disciples NNS have VHP had VHN their PP$ attention NN drawn VVN since IN the DT beginning NN . SENT 1 LS Inform VV Information NP Network NP Focus NP on IN Religious JJ Movements NNS , , Houghton NP St NP . SENT , , London NP WC NN 2 CD A DT 2 CD AE NP E NN mail NN . SENT Inform VV lse NN . SENT ac NNS . SENT uk NP . SENT no DT Internet NN site NN . SENT 2 CD Cesnur NP Centro NP Studi NP sulle NP Nuove NP Religioni NP , , Via NP Juvarra NP 20 CD , , I PP 10122 CD Torino NP tel NP . SENT 00 CD 39 JJ 011 CD 54 CD . SENT 19 CD . SENT 50 CD . SENT fax NN 00 CD 39 CD 011 CD 54 CD . SENT 19 CD . SENT 05 CD . SENT Internet NN site NN . SENT www JJ . SENT cesnur NN . SENT org NP . SENT E SYM mail NN address NN . SENT cesnurto NN tin NN . SENT it PP . SENT 3 CD Centre NP d NN information NN et CC d NN avis NP sur NP les FW organisations NNS sectaires NNS nuisibles NNS , , Rue NP Haute NP , , 139 CD 1000 CD Brussels NP tel NP . SENT 02 CD 504 CD . SENT 91 CD . SENT 68 CD . SENT The DT official JJ denomination NN of IN the DT Centre NP integrates VVZ the DT reference NN to TO organisations NNS sectaires NNS nuisibles NNS harmful JJ sectarian JJ organisations NNS , , as RB defined VVN in IN the DT report NN published VVN by IN the DT Parliamentary JJ enquiry NN commission NN . SENT a DT group NN with IN a DT philosophical JJ or CC religious JJ vocation NN , , or CC presenting VVG themselves PP as IN such JJ which WDT , , in IN its PP$ organisation NN or CC in IN practice NN , , carries VVZ out IN harmful JJ illegal JJ activities NNS , , damaging VVG to TO individuals NNS or CC to TO society NN or CC which WDT undermines VVZ human JJ dignity NN . SENT un NP groupement NP vocation NN philosophique NN ou NP religieuse NN , , ou NP se FW pr NP sentant NN comme NN tel NP , , qui NP , , dans NNS son NN organisation NN ou NP sa NP pratique NN , , se FW livre NN des FW activit NN s PP ill JJ gales NNS dommageables NNS , , nuit NN aux NP individus NP ou NP la NP soci NP t NN ou NP porte NP atteinte NP la NP dignit NN humaine NN . SENT 4 CD Address NN of IN the DT Interdiocesan NP group NN . SENT Secr NP tariat NP de FW la FW Conf NP rence NP piscopale NP , , rue NN Guimard NP , , 1 CD 1040 CD Brussels NP . SENT Information NN . SENT Professor NP A NP . SENT Denaux NP , , Tiensestraat NP , , 112 CD 3000 CD Leuven NP tel NP . SENT 016 CD 32 CD . SENT 63 CD . SENT 93 CD ou NP 32 CD . SENT 37 CD . SENT 93 CD . SENT fax NN 016 CD 32 CD . SENT 38 CD . SENT 62 CD . SENT E SYM mail NN address NN . SENT Adelbert NP . SENT Denaux NP theo NP . SENT kuleuven NP . SENT ac NNS . SENT be VB . SENT The DT Brussels NP Catholic NP Welcome VV Centre NP next JJ to TO the DT Bourse NP is VBZ also RB open JJ to TO the DT public NN for IN information NN or CC for IN Christian JJ advice NN Contact NN . SENT Bruxelles NP Accueil NP Porte NP Ouverte NP , , rue NN de NP Tabora NP , , 6 CD 1000 CD Brussels NP tel NP . SENT 02 CD 511 CD . SENT 81 CD . SENT 78 CD . SENT fax NN 02 CD 502 CD . SENT 76 CD . SENT 96 CD . SENT E SYM mail NN . SENT bapo NN skynet NN . SENT be VB . SENT 5 LS The DT Spiritual JJ Supermarket NN . SENT Pluralism NN and CC Globalization NP in IN the DT 21 CD st NP Century NP . SENT the DT Expanding VVG European NP Union NP and CC Beyond NP . SENT The DT many JJ conferences NNS and CC discourses NNS heard VVN at IN this DT meeting NN are VBP available JJ in IN English NP on IN the DT Cesnur NP Internet NP site NN note NN 2 CD . SENT